Pia Praefke vs Alina Sogomonyan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• On recent second serve effectiveness, Pia Praefke has secured 30.77% of points compared to Alina Sogomonyan's 24.32%. How important is this stat in predicting a winner? It heavily influences match outcomes.
• Considering return game statistics, Pia Praefke's proficiency shows with a 66.67% success rate on opponents' second serves, outperforming Alina Sogomonyan's 54.65%. On opponents' first serves, Pia maintains a slight edge with 35.29% over Alina's 33.33%.
• Pia Praefke demonstrates superior resilience under pressure by saving 70.83% of breakpoints, while Alina Sogomonyan saves just 47.17%.
• In terms of yearly performance, Pia Praefke has achieved a win rate of 50.00%, slightly above Alina's 46.67%.
• On indoor hard courts, both players share a similar win ratio of 50%. However, on clay, Pia struggles more with a 30% win rate compared to Alina’s 33%.
• Analyzing match level, Pia participates mostly in $10K Futures/ITF events with a 44.44% success rate, whereas Alina has a 46.67% win rate in the same tournament tier.
• Regarding opponent quality, Pia Praefke has faced lower-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 227.36, unlike Alina Sogomonyan, who has competed primarily against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 60.13.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Pia triumphs in 83% of these situations, while Alina has a 67% success rate.
• Past performances are key to predictions, yet current event statistics also provide invaluable insights into a player's form at the ongoing tournament event.

Editorial Prediction (September 30, 2025, UTC):

Pia Praefke displays her strongest asset in return games, particularly on opponents' second serves, which could be a decisive factor in this upcoming match. Her ability to save breakpoints also demonstrates her resilience under pressure, positioning her as a formidable opponent.

Alina Sogomonyan has consistently faced higher-ranked players, which may have refined her competitive edge. While she proves slightly less effective in pressure situations, her overall experience could offer her an edge if the match extends beyond two sets.

If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Pia Praefke's statistical advantage in such scenarios suggests she may handle the pressure better, potentially tipping the scales in her favor.

Based on performance patterns and comparative analysis, Pia Praefke appears more likely to secure victory in this match.